Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Scenarica's avatar

Article 8(v) is the one Western regulators will study and never replicate. "Excessively catering to users, inducing emotional dependence or addiction, and damaging users' real interpersonal relationships." That sentence bans the core business model of every AI companion startup in the US. The entire engagement loop that drives retention and monetisation is now illegal in China. The companies that can't operate there will concentrate in markets that haven't legislated yet, which means the regulatory gap becomes the product strategy.

Article 18's two hour pop-up requirement is the other one to watch. Not because it works, but because it establishes a baseline that every future regulation will reference and ratchet downward.

Sara Nóbrega's avatar

Article 19 is the interesting one to me. It's the same instinct behind gym membership cancellation laws that some US states passed after companies made quitting harder than joining. Forcing an easy exit is a strange thing to need a law for, until you remember how much product design has been built to avoid exactly that.

9 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?