Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Futuristic Autistic's avatar

I love everything you wrote here and wholeheartedly agree with your manifesto. The parts about the fragile nature of biological intelligence are especially compelling to me and actually highlight how precious it is. The “race to the bottom” and “biological intelligence decay” captures my sentiments too (and that of MANY others). You can count me in to join your movement.

Scenarica's avatar

The thirty-year arc from Barlow to this manifesto tells a specific story about how tools become substitutes. Barlow assumed cyberspace would extend biological intelligence. The manifesto documents the moment it started replacing it. The mechanism is precise: when the outputs of biological and silicon intelligence become indistinguishable, the market prices them identically and chooses the cheaper one. Biological intelligence loses market share because its outputs have been commoditised by silicon replicas, regardless of how different the underlying processes are.

the deeper asymmetry your manifesto names without formalising: silicon scales with investment, biological intelligence scales only with practice. You can accelerate silicon by spending money. You can only develop biological intelligence by spending time, decades of reading, failing, thinking, experiencing. When the economic incentives favour speed, the practice time disappears. Protecting biological intelligence is an infrastructure problem disguised as a philosophical one, and the infrastructure is measured in years of undistracted human development that the acceleration economy no longer provides.

No posts

Ready for more?